The report highlights a growing shift in catastrophe exposure, noting that wildfire risk is no longer confined to traditional Western hotspots. Texas has entered the top ten list of states with the highest number of vulnerable properties, signaling that suburban growth and the expansion of the wildland-urban interface are increasing danger zones nationwide. Despite this broader trend, California remains the primary focus due to the extreme concentration of risk within the state.
Chris Folkman, vice president at HazardHub, emphasized that broad regional assumptions often fail to capture the reality of individual properties. Because risk factors like vegetation density, topography, and fire suppression access vary drastically from one house to the next, ZIP code-level data is increasingly insufficient for accurate underwriting. The study found that neighboring homes on the same street can differ fourfold in their overall risk scores.

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!